Legal Opinion

Kroeplin v. County of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*427The following opinion was filed November 8, 1922:

Crownhart, J.

The regulation of places where nonintoxicating liquors, as defined in ch. 441, Laws 1921, are sold is well within the police power of the state. That power may be delegated to counties provided the system of town and county government remains “as nearly uniform, as practicable.” Secs. 22, 23, art. IV, Const. Those sections read as follows:

“Section 22. The legislature may confer upon the boards of supervisors of the several counties of the state such powers of a local, legislative and administrative character as they shall from time…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Carnation Milk Products Co. v. EmeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Milwaukee Sales & Investment Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State ex rel. Melms v. YoungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nyberg v. Board of School DirectorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Hjelming v. La Crosse CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Stetzer v. Chippewa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API