Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Milwaukee Sales & Investment Co. v. Railroad Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1921PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Original action in this court to determine the validity of the so-called “Rent Law.”

1Opinion of the Court

On June 21, 1921, the following opinion was filed:

2Per curiam

The law embodied in ch. 16, Laws of Special Session of 1920, commonly referred to as the “Rent Law,” is held invalid upon the ground that it is special legislation prohibited by the constitution of Wisconsin. An opinion by the court will be filed hereafter.

Vinje and Owen, JJ., dissent. Doerfler, J., took no part.

On July 13, 1921, the following opinion was filed:

Action brought in this court to enjoin the Railroad Commission from enforcing the provisions of ch. 16, Laws of 1920 (Special Session), against the plaintiff, a corporation of this…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Black v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Durkee v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. State v. WhitcomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Phelps v. RooneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Weco Products Co. v. Reed Drug Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State ex rel. Ford Hopkins Co. v. Mayor of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Christoph v. City of ChiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Doering v. SwobodaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Pabst Corp. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API