State ex rel. Carnation Milk Products Co. v. Emery
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
I
Crownhart, J.
It is but trite to say that the constitution of our state is the supreme.law. Therein will be *151found the powers of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government, each supreme in its field but coordinate in their sources of powers and the exercise thereof.
The greatest deference must be paid by each, department to the other acting within the scope of its powers. Any usurpation of power by one department at the expense of another is a wrong against the people who adopted the constitution as their charter of liberties and rights.
To the legislature was given the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Aicher Ex Rel. LaBarge v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.