Legal Opinion
People v. Perry
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1984No. B003576PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
OSBORNE, J. *
On this appeal following a plea of guilty, we conclude that the appeal must be dismissed because appellant has not complied with Penal Code section 1237.5. Even if section 1237.5 were not a bar, appellant’s contention is not reviewable after a guilty plea.
Facts and Contention
On December 6, 1983, appellant pleaded guilty to robbery, and admitted that in the commission of the offense, he personally used a firearm within the meaning of sections 12022.5 and 1203.06, subdivision (a)(1). Appellant waived a probation report and requested immediate sentencing. Probation was denied…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. SumstineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. PinonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. NelumsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. MaultsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Troy Z.California Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. BallardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. KomatsuAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1989
- People v. STURNSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.