Legal Opinion

People v. Komatsu

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided July 13, 1989No. Crim. A. No. 2579PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

OSBORNE, J.

Defendant was convicted of driving while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage a few months after a prior similar conviction. He appeals from an order granting probation. He contends the prosecution’s evidence apart from his admissions did not establish the corpus delicti, and therefore the trial court erroneously denied his motion to exclude evidence of his admissions. We affirm.

In every prosecution for a crime, it is necessary to prove, by evidence other than extrajudicial admissions of the defendant, the corpus delicti, i.e., the body or elements of the crime. The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. JacobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. MehaffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. People v. TowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. GerritsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. City of Easley v. PortmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. City of Easley v. PortmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API