People v. STURNS
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1386Opinion
JONES, P. J.
Russell Stums entered a plea of nolo contendere to possession of a controlled substance in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11350, subdivision (a). After sentencing, Stums filed a notice of appeal but did not seek a certificate of probable cause from the trial court. (See Pen. Code, § 1237.51; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 31(d).2)
More than six months after the time for seeking a certificate of probable cause had expired (see rule 31(d)), Stums applied to this court for relief from his default so that he could belatedly seek such a certificate. We initially denied…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re ChavezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. STURNSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000