Legal Opinion

People v. STURNS

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 2000No. A086415PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1386Opinion

JONES, P. J.

Russell Stums entered a plea of nolo contendere to possession of a controlled substance in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11350, subdivision (a). After sentencing, Stums filed a notice of appeal but did not seek a certificate of probable cause from the trial court. (See Pen. Code, § 1237.51; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 31(d).2)

More than six months after the time for seeking a certificate of probable cause had expired (see rule 31(d)), Stums applied to this court for relief from his default so that he could belatedly seek such a certificate. We initially denied…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. In Re ChavezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. STURNSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API