Osten v. Bureau of Workers' Comp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWelbaum, J.
*1191 {¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellant, Aysha Osten, appeals from a judgment dismissing her appeal from a decision of Defendant-Appellee, Sarah D. Morrison, Administrator of the Bureau of Workers' Compensation ("BWC"). Osten contends that the trial court erred when it concluded that she did not have a right to participate in the Workers' Compensation Fund as a matter of law.
{¶ 2} We conclude that the trial court correctly found that Osten, a traveling employee, was on a personal errand at the time of her injury and was not entitled to receive workers' compensation benefits. Accordingly, the judgment of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Lord v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Bralley v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McAlpine v. McCloudOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Terrell v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025