Legal Opinion

Osten v. Bureau of Workers' Comp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 2017No. 27583PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelbaum, J.

*1191 {¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellant, Aysha Osten, appeals from a judgment dismissing her appeal from a decision of Defendant-Appellee, Sarah D. Morrison, Administrator of the Bureau of Workers' Compensation ("BWC"). Osten contends that the trial court erred when it concluded that she did not have a right to participate in the Workers' Compensation Fund as a matter of law.

{¶ 2} We conclude that the trial court correctly found that Osten, a traveling employee, was on a personal errand at the time of her injury and was not entitled to receive workers' compensation benefits. Accordingly, the judgment of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lord v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Bralley v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McAlpine v. McCloudOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Terrell v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API