Legal Opinion

S. E. Olson Co. v. Brady

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1899No. Nos. 11,186—(31)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis against William B. Brady and Sarah R. Brady, defendants, and Willard W. Morse, doing business as Security Warehouse Company, garnishee. Upon issues between plaintiff and its garnishee the court, W. A. Kerr, J., ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, the garnishee appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

The plaintiff commenced an action for the recovery of money against the defendants, and summoned Willard W. Morse, doing business as the Security Warehouse Company, as garnishee, who appeared and made disclosure, denying liability. Thereupon the court made its order, granting the plaintiff leave to make, file and serve a supplemental complaint' against the garnishee, which was done, and the garnishee answered the complaint. The cause, as between the plaintiff and garnishee, was tried by the court without a jury.

The other material facts, as found by the trial court, briefly stated,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aultman, Miller & Co. v. MarkleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. O. L. Packard Machinery Co. v. LaevWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haaren v. MouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Gilloley v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Caldwell Backing & T. Co. v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Wipperman Mercantile Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Webster Manufacturing Co. v. PenrodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API