Webster Manufacturing Co. v. Penrod
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Benton county to recover $3,994.59. William Trolander having been served with garnishee summons, defendant appeared specially and moved to dismiss the garnishment proceedings. From an order, Taylor, J., dismissing these proceedings, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
April 25, 1907, appellant, through its attorney, J. A. Senn, residing at Sauk Rapids, commenced this action against defendant by filing its complaint in the office of the clerk of court of Benton county, where defendant resided. On the day previous, April 24, the attorney drew up an affidavit for garnishment, and a garnishee summons, naming respondent, William Trolander, as garnishee, and on the same day duly mailed the affidavit to the clerk of court at Foley, the county seat, and duly mailed the garnishee summons to the sheriff of Hennepin county, wherein the garnishee resided, with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alworth v. GordonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Aultman, Miller & Co. v. MarkleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- S. E. Olson Co. v. BradySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Jewett v. GreeneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1832
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Brooks v. CookMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Benjamin Ojogwu v. Rodenburg Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Bond v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- McMaster v. RubyOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Chapman v. FoshaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.