Legal Opinion
Reaction Molding Technologies, Inc. v. General Electric Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 18, 1984No. Civ. A. 82-4970PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Senior District Judge.
On April 26, 1984, 585 F.Supp. 1097, I wrote an extensive opinion denying plaintiffs and defendant’s motions for partial summary judgment and setting forth the law to be applied at trial. 1 I have tried the case without a jury. The following constitute my findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Plaintiff, a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania, produces plastic parts by means of a process known as reaction injection molding. Reaction Molding Technologies (Rim) produces the parts from molds. Rim…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frank E. Dorton and J. A. Castle, Partners, D/B/A the Carpet Mart v. Collins & Aikman Corporation and Painter Carpet Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Luria Brothers & Co., Inc. v. Pielet Brothers Scrap Iron & Metal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Idaho Power Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Black Gold Coal Corporation v. Shawville Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Reaction Molding Technologies, Inc. v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
3Cited by21 opinions
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Rich Products Corp. v. Kemutec, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
- Reilly Foam Corp. v. Rubbermaid Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Northrop Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Litronic Industries, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Master Palletizer Systems, Inc. v. T.S. Ragsdale Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.