Legal Opinion

Guaranty National Insurance Company, a Colorado Corporation v. American Motorists Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 18, 1992No. 91-35836PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The decision of the district court reported at 758 F.Supp. 1394 (D.Mont.1991) is affirmed, with this limitation.

One of the parties to the case in the district court was Harbor Insurance Company, which had issued a true excess insurance policy. In this setting, a true excess policy is one which is specifically intended to only come into play when the limits of the underlying coverage are exhausted. It is issued in anticipation of the existence of the underlying policy and is priced in the belief that the excess carrier will not have to provide a defense. See Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Continental National American Insurance Companies and Transcontinental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Guaranty National Insurance v. American Motorists InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1991

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Simmental Ass'n v. Coregis InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. Texas Employers Insurance v. Underwriting Members of LloydsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
  3. National Casualty Co. v. Western World InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. Safety National Casualty Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Fulton v. Lloyds & Institute of London Underwriting CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API