Legal Opinion

General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. Safety National Casualty Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 1993No. 92-4150PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PADOVA, District Judge.

This diversity action requires the Court to determine the extent of an excess insurer’s duty to contribute toward the costs of defending its insured. The parties agree that this dispute may be resolved summarily, and each has filed an appropriate motion for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). 1 For the following reasons, I conclude that the excess insurer in this case, defendant Safety National Insurance Corporation (“Safety National”), has an equitable duty to contribute on a pro rata basis toward the costs of defending its insured. I…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Lujan v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Home Indemnity Co. v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Contrans, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schneider National Transport v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. London MarketWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Lexington Insurance v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  4. Charter Oak Insurance v. Maglio Fresh FoodDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Builders Transport, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API