Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Continental National American Insurance Companies and Transcontinental Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 25, 1989No. 87-2841PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (Hartford) appeals the decision of a district court rejecting and dismissing its claims against Continental National American Insurance Companies and Transcontinental Insurance Company (collectively, Transcontinental). Hartford seeks here, as it sought below, to have Transcontinental bear the expenses of defending an action against the County of Mariposa which both Hartford and Transcontinental insured. On the basis of the language of the companies’ policies we conclude that Hartford, not Transcontinental, had the obligation of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Edward Ashton v. Kenneth CoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Fort Vancouver Plywood Co., a Washington Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Keck, Mahin & Cate v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Holden v. HagopianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Westbay Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Adult Video Association, Doe, Inc., Roe, Inc., Paul Poe v. William Barr, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Federated Rural Electric Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.