Legal Opinion

Raymond Quigley v. Internal Revenue Service, C. I. Fox, District Director

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 14, 1960No. 15584PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant taxpayer sued to quash a levy and to enjoin further collection of income taxes assessed against him. A statute provides: “Except as provided in section ■ * * * 6213(a), no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax bill shall be maintained in any court.” Internal Revenue Code of 1954, § 7421(a), 26 U.S.C.A. § 7421(a). Under § 6213(a) appellant was entitled to an injunction to restrain collection of' his tax until ninety days following the issuance of the statutory notice of deficiency specified in § 6212(a), or, if he had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Graham v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Flynn, M. Rutledge v. United States of America by and Through Eggers, Roscoe Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Appeal of M. Rutledge FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. McGraw-Hill, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  3. Frank R. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  4. Hobson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Schortmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API