Legal Opinion

Melson v. Phenix Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1896PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Actions on insurance policies. (1) Before Judge Clark.. Clayton superior court. March term, 1895. (2) Before Judge MacDonell. -City court of Savannah. July term, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

These were actions against fire insurance companies. In the first case, the policy contained a stipulation that no suit or action thereon should be sustainable against the company “unless such suit or action shall be commenced within twelve months next after the loss shall occur.” The policy sued on in the second ease stipulated that no suit or action thereon should be sustainable “unless commenced within twelve months next after the fire.” In each case, an action was in fact begun within the time limited by the policy, a *723nonsuit granted, and a new action brought within six…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Schrœder v. Merchants & Mechanics' InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Underwriters' Agency v. SutherlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Home Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Maxwell Bros. v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. AmosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Johnson v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API