Legal Opinion

Abraham v. Hodges

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided June 20, 2002No. C/A 1:02-2078-22PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST GOVERNOR HODGES

CURRIE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This case presents a question which can be easily resolved by reference to a rather well known decision issued by the United States Supreme Court in 1819: McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819). 1 In that case, the Supreme Court addressed what is generally referred to as the “Supremacy Clause” of the United States Constitution (art. VI, § 2), which establishes the relationship between the states and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians v. Nielson Ex Rel. Utah Department of Environmental QualityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API