Legal Opinion
United States v. South Carolina
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided December 22, 2011No. Civil Action Nos. 2:11-cv-2958, 2:11-cv-2779PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RICHARD MARK GERGEL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on motions for preliminary injunction filed by plaintiffs in the two above-captioned matters. These actions arise out of legislation adopted by the South Carolina General Assembly on June 27, 2011 (hereafter referred to as “Act 69” or “the Act”). Act 69 attempts to address a broad range of immigration related issues through, inter alia, the adoption of various state criminal provisions, employer sanctions and mandates to local law enforcement regarding the identification and apprehension of persons unlawfully present…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- United States v. South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- Association of American Publishers, Inc. v. FroshDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Belimed, Inc. v. BleeckerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.