Legal Opinion

In re Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 8, 2020No. 5:20-cv-03556Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 Case No. 20-cv-03556-BLF 8 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 STAY DISCOVERY 10 IN RE GOOGLE DIGITAL 11 ADVERTISING ANTITRUST 12 LITIGATION 13 14 This is a class action antitrust lawsuit brought by Plaintiffs Hanson Law Firm, PC, Surefreight 15 Global LLC d/b/a Prana Pets, and Vitor Lindo (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) against Defendant 16 Google LLC (“Google”). Before the Court is Google’s Motion to Stay Discovery. Mot., ECF 41. 17 The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Ebner v. Fresh, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Michael R. Wood, Individually and Dba National Photo Services v. Willard W. McEwen Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Gray v. First Winthrop Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
  5. William v. Wenger v. Paul D. Monroe, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Adjutant General of the California National Guard California National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API