Legal Opinion
William v. Wenger v. Paul D. Monroe, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Adjutant General of the California National Guard California National Guard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 17, 2002No. 00-56696PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge.
We must decide whether the district court properly dismissed various claims brought by a retired Colonel in the California Army National Guard which challenged military personnel decisions.
I
William Wenger, now retired, served to the rank of Colonel in the California Army National Guard (the “Guard”). He served in the United States Army on active duty for over thirty years, and as a member of the Guard for approximately nine years. On the evening of March 24, 2000, Wenger was a guest speaker at a Guard social event known as a ‘Dining-In’ hosted at the Glendale…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- John R. Ulrich, Jr., M.D. v. City and County of San Francisco Laguna Honda Hospital Maria v. Rivero, M.D. Theresa Berta, M.D. Melissa Welch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. HovsepianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Santiago v. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Serv. Women's Action Network v. MattisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Tarhuni v. HolderDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.