Legal Opinion

Gray v. First Winthrop Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 25, 1990No. C-90-2600 JPVPublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY

VUKASIN, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery was scheduled to be heard on October 25, 1990. After a review of the briefs, this court considered it appropriate to submit the motion on the pleadings pursuant to Local Rule 220-1, and now DENIES the motion.

BACKGROUND

This is a securities class action arising out of a real estate limited partnership. Plaintiffs, who are investors in the limited partnership, allege numerous federal and common law claims against defendants, who are the offeror and other parties involved…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011
  2. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Tracinda Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997
  3. Skellerup Industries Ltd. v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995
  4. Ministerio Roca Solida v. United States Department of Fish & WildlifeDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013
  5. In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API