Legal Opinion
Grabhorn, Inc. v. Metropolitan Service District
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 19, 2009No. Civil Case 08-1512-KIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, District Judge:
Plaintiff Grabhorn, Inc. owns and operates a dry solid waste facility, the Lakeside Reclamation Landfill (“Lakeside”). Grabhorn has a Designated Facilities Agreement (“DFA”) with defendant Metropolitan Service District (“Metro”) to collect solid waste from areas within Metro’s boundaries. This action arose due to Metro’s unilateral termination of Grabhorn’s DFA. Before the court is Metro’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and some related motions. For the reasons below, I do not dismiss any of the claims.
LEGAL STANDARDS
A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Depaul Industries v. Benjamin MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- DePaul Industries v. City of EugeneDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Kramer v. Southern Oregon UniversityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014