Legal Opinion

DePaul Industries v. City of Eugene

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 29, 2020No. 6:18-cv-00320Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DEPAUL INDUSTRIES, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:18-cv-00320-MC v. OPINION AND ORDER CITY OF EUGENE, et al, Defendants. MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiff DePaul Industries alleges that the City of Eugene and a number of its employees violated Plaintiff's Constitutional and statutory rights by unlawfully annulling two security service contracts between Plaintiff and the City, among other things. Pl.’s Third Am. Compl. (“TAC”) ¥ 1, ECF No. 94. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Benjamin Miller, a lawyer in the City Attorney’s Office, participated in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API