DePaul Industries v. City of Eugene
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DEPAUL INDUSTRIES, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:18-cv-00320-MC v. OPINION AND ORDER CITY OF EUGENE, et al, Defendants. MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiff DePaul Industries alleges that the City of Eugene and a number of its employees violated Plaintiff's Constitutional and statutory rights by unlawfully annulling two security service contracts between Plaintiff and the City, among other things. Pl.’s Third Am. Compl. (“TAC”) ¥ 1, ECF No. 94. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Benjamin Miller, a lawyer in the City Attorney’s Office, participated in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.