Legal Opinion

Cohn v. Aetna Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 30, 1990No. 13615PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court confirming an $855,000 underinsured motorist. arbitration award. The dispositive issue is whether coverage for underinsured motorists contained in a business automobile liability policy insuring a number of individually listed motor vehicles may be combined or “stacked” in determining the total amount of coverage available to a single claimant. We conclude that such a result is beyond the reasonable expectations of the parties to the insurance contract and that “stacking” is inappropriate in the context of fleet automobile liability…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  2. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. StanfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Tucker v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. Lambert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Covenant Insurance v. CoonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Wilson v. Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. CNA Insurance Co. v. ColmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Kent v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API