Legal Opinion

Ex Parte McPherson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 2000No. 73,453PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HollandHolland, J.

MEYERS, MANSFIELD, PRICE, JOHNSON and KEASLER, JJ., join.

Applicant was convicted of sexual assault, and punishment was assessed at twenty years confinement. No appeal was taken from this conviction. Applicant has now filed an application for a writ of habe-as corpus in which he contends his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file various pretrial motions. We deny the requested relief.

This is Applicant’s second application for writ of habeas corpus. On January 8, 1992, this Court denied the previous application in which Applicant claimed his counsel was ineffective for failing…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MaldonadoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Ex Parte WhitesideCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Ex Parte RawlinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

4Cited by57 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MoussazadehCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Ex Parte KerrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Ex Parte SantanaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Ex Parte Balderrama, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  5. Aguirre, JoelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API