Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Rawlinson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1997No. 72757PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*199 OPINION

2Per curiam

Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation, and the jury assessed his punishment at confinement for ninety-nine years. Applicant has filed this application pursuant to Article 11.07, V.AC.C.P.

Applicant contends he was denied effective assistance of counsel on appeal by his counsel’s abandonment of the appeal without notice. Before we can decide this issue, we must examine whether this Court has the authority to address the merit of Applicant’s claim. Applicant filed a previous application under Art. 11.07 claiming there was an erroneous deadly weapon finding in the instant…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TorresCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Ex Parte LadayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Arcia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Ex Parte EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Ex Parte McPhersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Ex Parte GoldenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API