Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Williams v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1969No. Civ. 33380PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHENS, Acting P. J.

The preliminary facts giving rise to the petition for writ of mandate, the issuance of which is the subject of this appeal are not in dispute.

On or about December 31, 1963, Herbert Williams (hereinafter Williams) was convicted of violating Vehicle Code section 23102, subdivision (a) (driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor) in the Municipal Court of the Pasadena Judicial District, County of Los Angeles, following his plea of guilty at the time of the arraignment. The court recommended no suspension of Williams’ driver’s license.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In re WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hough v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Houlihan v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. DeRasmo v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Axness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API