Legal Opinion

Axness v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1988No. A040921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLEY, J.

Petitioner Eric V. Axness (appellant) appeals from an order denying his amended petition for writ of mandate to prevent the California Department of Motor Vehicles (department) from suspending his California driver’s license based on two convictions of driving under the influence (Veh. Code, § 23152)1 within five years. The petition challenges the suspension on the ground that the second conviction, which occurred in Minneso*1493ta, was unconstitutional. We hold that in the circumstances of this case appellant may challenge the constitutionality of the Minnesota conviction by way…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Larsen v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Moomjian v. ZolinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Romo v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Morris v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API