Legal Opinion

United States v. Corbin Farm Service, Patrick William Feeney, Frank Harry Michaud, Jr., and John Richard Harris

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 12, 1978No. 78-1286PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the United States from a judgment of the district court dismissing nine counts of an information filed against defendants for multiplicity. The sole issue is whether the proper unit of prosecution for the killing of ducks under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 703 et seq., is each duck killed. The district court ruled that multiple bird deaths resulting from a single transaction cannot be separately charged under the MBTA. We affirm.

The defendants were each involved in various capacities with the application of Furadan 4, a registered pesticide, to an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Corbin Farm ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1978

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lipoi Alaelua v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Michael H. Weitzenhoff Thomas W. MarianiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. State v. MartiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Quick v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Mahler v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API