Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Quick v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1979No. 3298, 3462 and 3463PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

William Thomas Jackson, Raymond Quick, and T.M., a minor, seek review of rulings made by the superior court in Ket-chikan regarding the admissibility and use of confessions made by them to the Ketchi-kan police. Subsequent to these rulings Quick filed a petition for review, Jackson pleaded nolo contendere to charges of manslaughter and burglary in a dwelling, and T.M. was adjüdged a delinquent after a trial on charges of attempted robbery, manslaughter, and burglary in a dwelling. Jackson also appeals the sentence which resulted from his plea. The facts are as follows:

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. BleylSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Waring v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Troyer v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Giacomazzi v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API