Legal Opinion
United States v. Corbin Farm Service
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 23, 1978No. Crim. S-77-179PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacBRIDE, Chief Judge.
Defendants are charged in a twelve count information with misdemeanor violations of a Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. § 136 et seq., and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), 16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq.; the alleged violations arise from the application of a registered pesticide to an alfalfa field and the subsequent death of a number of American widgeon, a water fowl protected under the MBTA. Defendants have responded with a number of pretrial motions.
The defendants are Corbin Farm Service (CFS), a dealer and distributor of…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Michael H. Weitzenhoff Thomas W. MarianiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. MartiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Quick v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. Corbin Farm Service, Patrick William Feeney, Frank Harry Michaud, Jr., and John Richard HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Mahler v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.