Legal Opinion

Mahler v. United States Forest Service

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided June 7, 1996No. NA 95-0008-C H/HPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HAMILTON, District Judge.

The principal focus of this case. is fifty acres of diseased and dying red pine trees in the Hoosier National Forest. The United States Forest Service has decided to “clear-cut” forty-six acres, to “shelterwood” cut another four acres, and to dispose of the timber in a salvage sale. Plaintiff Andy Mahler is a nearby resident and frequent visitor to the Hoosier National Forest. He seeks an injunction to stop the salvage operation, arguing that the Forest Service has violated the National Forest Management Act of 1976…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Newton County Wildlife Ass'n v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Apollo Energies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Curry v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Heartwood, Inc. v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1999
  5. United States v. CITGO Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API