Legal Opinion

Krawczyk Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1954No. Appeal, No. 59PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This is an appeal from the denial of the Unemployment Compensation Board to allow the appellant’s claim for compensation. The Board affirmed the referee in denying compensation because the claimant-appellant’s unemployment was “due to his discharge . . . from work for willful misconduct connected with his work” as provided in Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, as amended by the Act of May 23, 1949, P. L. 1738, 43 PS §802 (e).

The claimant was employed as a battery loader at the Jaunty Fabric Corporation in Scranton, working-on the 7 A.M. to 3 P.M.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Detterer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Devlin Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Butchko Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Davis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Moyer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. LeGare v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API