Legal Opinion

Butchko Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1951No. Appeal, No. 14PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

In this unemployment compensation case, upon appeal by the employer, the referee reversed the decision of the bureau, which had found claimant eligible for benefits. The referee found that the claimant provoked her own discharge by taking time off without permission and regardless of a warning as to the result. The referee held that she was ineligible for benefits under section 102 (e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, as amended by the Act of May 23, 1919, P.L. 1738, 13. PS §802. The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirmed the decision of the referee. After…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Detterer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Devlin Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Moyer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Trotta v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Krawczyk Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Williams v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API