Mills v. Los Angeles Junk Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
Appellant alleged that he was injured in respondent’s place of business by reason of the negligence of respondent in so operating one of its presses that a bale of paper was blown therefrom, violently striking appellant and throwing him to the ground. The case was tried before a jury. The jury found for defendant. From the judgment entered on the verdict of the jury and from an order denying a motion for a new trial plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.
An appeal, of course, will not lie from an order denying a motion for á new trial. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 963, subd. 2.) We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Texas Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Swartz v. FeddershonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Vance v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barrera v. De La TorreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Newman v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Kelley v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Gould v. SamuelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Barrera v. De La TorreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.