Legal Opinion
Swartz v. Feddershon
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1928No. Docket Nos. 5808, 5809PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J., pro tem.
These cases were tried together in the superior court, and in each case judgment was rendered against the defendant, from which he appeals. Both appeals are submitted to us on the same record and the same briefs. The eases arose out of a collision between two automobiles, one driven by the defendant, and the other driven by the plaintiff Guy 0. Swartz, in which his wife, the plaintiff Jennie J. Swartz, was riding. In one of the cases Guy 0. Swartz sued alone as plaintiff for damages caused by personal injuries suffered by him in this collision, for damages caused to him by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Diller v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Simonsen v. L. J. Christopher Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Carbaugh v. White Bus LineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Commonwealth Insurance of New York v. Riverside-Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Borror v. Department of InvestmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Cowden v. CrippenMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Dickinson v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Grimes v. Richfield Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Cummins v. Yellow & Checker Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.