Legal Opinion
McMenemy v. City of Rochester
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 14, 1999No. 6:94-cv-06289PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Decision and Order
SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
Preliminary Statement
The plaintiff filed his initial complaint on June 14, 1994, an amended complaint on February 17, 1996, and a “Supplemented Amended Complaint” (“Supplemental Complaint”) (document # 7) on September 11, 1998. It is that later complaint that is before the Court on his motion for partial summary judgment and the defendants’ motions for judgment on the pleadings, or in the alternative, summary judgment. The First and Second causes of action in the plaintiff’s Supplemental Complaint allege that the defendants violated Title VII of the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McMenemy v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Laurie Mcmenemy v. City Of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001