First National Bank of Escondido v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
Judgment was rendered against the defendants from which and an order denying a motion for a new trial they appeal. The points to be considered as alleged by appellants are, first, the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of the court that Mina W. Williams signed the note as principal and co-maker and for a valuable consideration; and, second, the right to have findings presented and served upon the opposing counsel five days before the same are signed by the judge.
Concerning the second proposition, we dismiss appellants’ contention without passing upon its merits because it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hobson v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Amundson v. ShaferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. DunlapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peebler v. SeawellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Oil Tool Exchange, Inc. v. SchuhCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Italo Petroleum Corp. v. ShingleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937