Legal Opinion

Italo Petroleum Corp. v. Shingle

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1937No. Civ. No. 10563PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff sought by this action to obtain the cancellation of two promissory notes executed by plaintiff in favor of defendant Fred Shingle, syndicate manager, and to enjoin the prosecution of any action for the purpose of collecting upon said notes. From a judgment granting to plaintiff said relief, defendants have appealed. For the purpose of this discussion, defendant Fred Shingle, syndicate manager, may be treated as the sole defendant and appellant.

The transcript and the briefs are rather voluminous but the essential facts, as shown by the pleadings and the uncontradicted evidence, may…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Drovers National Bank v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Shoenhair v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Randisi v. SimoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. First National Bank of Escondido v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. San Francisco Mercantile Union v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. AbadjianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API