Legal Opinion
Woodmont, Inc. v. Daniels
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1959No. Nos. 6041, 6042PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal and cross appeal from a judgment in a diversity action for damages based upon actionable misrepresentations in the execution of a contract. Federal jurisdiction is concededly present. By the terms of the contract of June 20, 1955, as amended, the plaintiffappellee, Daniels Construction Company, agreed with appellant, Woodmont, Inc., to excavate approximately 2,500,000 cubic yards of overburden for the strip mining of a uranium ore mine in Utah for 290 per cubic yard. Appellant, Continental Materials Corporation, the parent company of Woodmont, guaranteed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Inland Freight Lines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Hecht v. MetzlerUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- Leasure v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Estate Counseling Service, Inc., a Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- United Securities Corporation v. FranklinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Gutter v. E.I. Dupont De NemoursDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.