Legal Opinion
United Securities Corporation v. Franklin
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 3, 1962No. 2885PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
Upon a claimed default in payment on a conditional sales contract for the purchase of an automobile, plaintiff, holder of the note and assignee of the contract, repossessed the automobile and after resale sued for the deficiency. Defendants’ answer alleged that they had been induced to purchase the automobile through the false representations of the seller, and denied that they were delinquent in their payments at the time of the repossession. By counterclaim defendants sought compensatory damages for the repossession, punitive damages for fraud in the sale, and the value of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mammoth Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Wardman-Justice Motors, Inc. v. PetrieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1930
- Commercial Credit Company v. ChildsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Ballard v. SpruillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Washington Medical Center, Inc. v. HolleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- J. Edward Day v. William H. AveryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Leonard Davis v. Theodor SchuchatCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Robinson v. SariskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.