Legal Opinion

Hecht v. Metzler

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1897No. 695PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from the Fourth district court, Territory of Utah. Hon. H. W. Smith, Judge. Action by Charles Hecht against Joseph Metzler for tort committed in the ■ fraudulent misrepresentation of land and its rental value. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. No briefs were filed.

1Opinion of the Court

MINER, J.:

On August 1, 1893, at Denver, Colo., appellant and respondent exchanged real estate by written contract, which was afterwards executed by interchange of deeds of conveyance. By the terms of the written contract, appellant agreed to exchange 3,250 acres of land in Colorado, at a stipulated price of $30 per acre, and some personal property, for four pieces of property belonging to respondent in Ogden, Utah. The price of the Ogden property was not fixed in the contract, but was fixed in the deeds of conveyance. Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that the price of each piece of Ogden…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. Page v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Taylor v. MinorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  5. Drew v. BeallIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Estate Counseling Service, Inc., a Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Sullivan v. HelbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Oceanic Villas, Inc. v. Godson, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Stuck v. Delta Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API