Legal Opinion

Sanok v. Grimes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1983No. OTC 1736, SC 28554PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, C. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Taxpayer brought an amended complaint in the tax court, naming as defendants the county assessor and three county appraisers. Defendants, all four of whom are named both individually and in their official capacity, moved to dismiss on grounds that they are not proper parties and that the Department of Revenue (Department) is a necessary party not joined. Plaintiff argued that jurisdiction is proper in the tax court because all his claims “arise under” tax law, and moved to join the Department if it is a necessary party.

The tax court denied the motion to join and dismissed the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Mullaney v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. McCannel v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Jarvill v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Guilliams v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Nutbrown v. MunnOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Martin v. City of TigardOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Eklof v. PerssonOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Jackson County v. Jackson Education Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Sanok v. GrimesOregon Supreme Court · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API