Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1965No. 40759PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

Counsel for the plaintiff in error have, in their brief, discussed the various special grounds of the motion for a new trial somewhat out of their regular order, and counsel for defendant in error have, in their brief, adhered to the order established in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error. Accordingly, we shall discuss such assignments of error as we deem to merit discussion in the order adopted by counsel for the parties in their arguments.

Ground 5 of the motion for a new trial complains of the refusal of the trial court to grant the request of counsel for the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mitchum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Kendrick v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Stewart v. MynattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. SeymourCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Fallaw v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API