Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. Seymour

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 2, 1969No. 44512PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

The court instructed the jury: “The burden of proof is on the plaintiff, Mr. Whitehead; and in order for him to obtain a verdict in his favor by you the burden is on him to prove by a preponderance of the evidence not only that the defendants were negligent in one or more of the ways set forth in the plaintiff’s petition but also that such negligence by the defendants was the proximate cause of his damage, if any.” He then stated: “In addition to the foregoing, the burden is also on the plaintiff to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he could not have avoided the damage…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Royals v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Shedden v. StilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Williams v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. City Council v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Yandle v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. PleasentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Kitchens v. Winter Co. Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Beringause v. Fogleman Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Little Rapids Corp. v. McCamyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Myers v. BolemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API