Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1963No. 39964PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

The plaintiff in error (defendant in trial court) assigns error on the overruling of his motion for new trial after a verdict for the defendant in error (plaintiff in trial court) in an action brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Held:

1. This court has held, “it is the duty of the trial judge, without any written request, to state to the jury with equal fullness, and fairly to each side, the contentions of both parties, and in doing so no material contention of either party should be omitted.” Bank of LaFayette v. Phipps, 24 Ga. App. 613, 614 (101 SE 696); Seaboard…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Manchester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Kendrick v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  4. Trammell v. Atlanta Coach Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Heinz v. BackusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Marriott Corp. v. American Academy of Psychotherapists, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Plourd v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Clyatt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Atlanta Metallic Casket Co. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API