Legal Opinion

Conkey v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 8, 1959No. Reap. Dec. 9392; Entry No. 10324, etcPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

The instant appeals for reappraisement, which have been consolidated for the purposes of trial, relate to various importations from India of unbleached cotton sheeting. The merchandise in each of the shipments was entered at the invoice unit price, less certain nondutiable charges, not here in issue, which, in the case of reap-praisement number 237362-A was $0.14% per yard, C & F, Boston, and in the case of all other entries was $0.16% per yard, C & F, Boston. Said merchandise was appraised at, respectively, $0.1645 per yard, net, packed, less nondutiable charges, and $0.1843, per…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanders Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  2. Scharf Bros. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938
  3. United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1938
  4. United States v. Alexander Bros.United States Customs Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API