Legal Opinion
David v. United States
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 10, 1982No. CV 80-4156-RMT(Kx)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TAKASUGI, District Judge.
This memorandum decision is filed pursuant to Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
FACTS
Plaintiff David initiated this action seeking a refund of employment taxes, penalties and interest assessed against Grand Care Inc. (“GCI”), a California corporation, excluding any sums representing withholding and Federal Insurance Contribution Act (“FICA”) taxes deducted from the wages of GCI employees.
GCI is a corporation which commenced doing business in early 1972. It owned and operated Grand Care Convalescent Hospital in Anaheim, California and Burbank Palms…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Halton Tractor Company, Inc., a Corporation, and Wes Durston, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Parsons v. AnglimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Adams v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1974
- Arndt v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
- Hummell v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1980
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jane Flaster Kuznitsky, Formerly Known as Jane Flaster Biggard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Brodey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Schoenherr v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
- Sandrow v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Denham v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.