Legal Opinion
Denham v. United States
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 22, 1992No. CV 91-4881 JGDPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
DAVIES, District Judge.
By this action filed on September 11, 1991, Plaintiff Marilyn S. Denham seeks a refund of $31,325.31, which she asserts was a levied tax payment. The facts are not in dispute. Trial was held on August 24, 1992, at which time the parties offered exhibits in evidence and presented arguments to the Court. The Court took the case under submission. The Court has reviewed and considered the submitted exhibits, the stipulated facts set forth in the Pre-Trial Conference Order, and all other relevant material. For the reasons expressed below, the Court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sun Valley Gasoline, Inc. v. Ernst Enterprises, Inc., Richard H. Ernst and Eunice R. ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. United States of America, and Internal Revenue Service, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Beresford Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Earl Winebrenner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Donahue Industries, Inc., Dba Donahue Printing Company, and Rainier National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ferrel v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1993
- Bank of New Hampshire v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
- Candor v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Wee Luv Childcare, Inc. v. United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1997