Legal Opinion

United States v. Halton Tractor Company, Inc., a Corporation, and Wes Durston, Inc., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 15, 1958No. 15396PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

Halton Tractor Company, Inc., a corporation, here called Halton, and Wes Durston, Inc., a -corporation, here called Durston, both filed actions seeking to recover, as wrongfully collected, sums which they paid to the Collector of Internal Revenue, for social security and withholding taxes owing by one Lloyd H. Watson. In each case judgment was for the plaintiffs from which the United States has appealed.

Prior to January, 1948, Watson, a contractor, had purchased from each of these corporations, various items of heavy machinery including tractors, scrapers and land…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Commissioner v. SternSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Busse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. Paul Pipola and Julia Pipola v. Mae Chicco and Yorkville Savings and Loan Association, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. PappasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. Wakefield Fisheries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Cim International, a Utah Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API