Sandrow v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WALDMAN, District Judge.
I. Introduction '
This is a tax refund ease. Plaintiff sued to recover payments he made to satisfy tax deficiencies of 5727 Bar Inc. of which plaintiff was the sole shareholder. After a trial, a jury found that plaintiff was entitled to a refund of $12,907.30 plus interest. Presently before the court is defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the alternative, Motion for New Trial.
II. Legal Standard
Judgment as a matter of law should be entered only when taking the evidence and all inferences justifiable therefrom in a light most favorable to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roebuck, Dr. James R. v. Drexel UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Aloe Coal Company and Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Klein v. HollingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- First National Bank of Emlenton, Pennsylvania v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Bhaya v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Warren Ex Rel. Orlando v. Reading School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- DiJoseph v. VuottoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film, Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Agrizap, Inc. v. Woodstream Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.