Legal Opinion

Sandrow v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-0760PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WALDMAN, District Judge.

I. Introduction '

This is a tax refund ease. Plaintiff sued to recover payments he made to satisfy tax deficiencies of 5727 Bar Inc. of which plaintiff was the sole shareholder. After a trial, a jury found that plaintiff was entitled to a refund of $12,907.30 plus interest. Presently before the court is defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the alternative, Motion for New Trial.

II. Legal Standard

Judgment as a matter of law should be entered only when taking the evidence and all inferences justifiable therefrom in a light most favorable to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roebuck, Dr. James R. v. Drexel UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Aloe Coal Company and Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Klein v. HollingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. First National Bank of Emlenton, Pennsylvania v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  5. Bhaya v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Warren Ex Rel. Orlando v. Reading School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. DiJoseph v. VuottoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film, Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Agrizap, Inc. v. Woodstream Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API